[ SECRET POST #5375 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #5375 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.
[Persona 5]



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 07 secrets from Secret Submission Post #769.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[philstar22]

It really depends on the type of media it is, for both of them. If the media is actually trying to be historically or scientifically accurate, then I'll judge it more harshly. Whereas if it is scifi/fantasy/horror kinds of things, I'm going to give it a lot more leeway unless the author is explicitly saying their stuff is accurate and especially if they criticize the lack of realism in other genre stuff but their stuff is pretty innacurate too.

[tei]

Yeah, I agree with this. Also, for me the medium matters-- if it's on TV, I'm going to give more leeway for historical accuracy because I recognize that budgetary constraints mean not everything is going to look perfect, and decisions about small details are often being made by lower-level people in the costuming or prop procurement departments. If it's a novel, though, I have 0 tolerance for anything being historically inaccurate.