[ SECRET POST #5375 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #5375 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.
[Persona 5]



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 07 secrets from Secret Submission Post #769.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

among creators, definitely. often phrased as, if you want to break the rules you have to understand the rules first, which is how people define subverting tropes in writing, creating new art styles vs just ugly art, the difference between groundbreaking visual design and less-so, etc.

so I'm guessing someone got sold on this author subverting tropes when it fact she only wrote a messy not-actually-subverting thing.

[(Anonymous)]

About your second point, that would make more sense then my take away. I was under the impression that what the OP was saying is that the author herself defined and explained the rule in her book, and it was a surprising point of view for this author to have compared to her usual work.