Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2021-10-10 03:38 pm
[ SECRET POST #5392 ]
⌈ Secret Post #5392 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 34 secrets from Secret Submission Post #772.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Immortal romances
(Anonymous) 2021-10-10 09:46 pm (UTC)(link)So being mortal humans ourselves, we like to imagine that immortals would see the world in a comparable way to the way that we see it, and would form emotional attachments with mortals. And that also allows us to tell stories that are familiar and satisfying in human terms, instead of stories based on horror or cognitive estrangement. The problem is fundamentally that there's nothing we can really use to judge or understand the experience of being an immortal human. It's totally outside of human understanding, by definition. And I think this is a common theme between a lot of different speculative tropes - there's no guide in human experience that tells us what these situations would be like, and so we fall back on things that are familiar from our own experience even though they're unrealistic because they're familiar and because they allow us to tell stories that are related to our experiences and make sense in human terms. It's the same thing in superhero comics, for example.
Re: Immortal romances
(Anonymous) 2021-10-10 11:20 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Immortal romances
(Anonymous) 2021-10-10 11:56 pm (UTC)(link)