[ SECRET POST #5408 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #5408 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Horrible Histories]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Buffy the Vampire Slayer]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Incarnations of Immortality]


__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.








Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 25 secrets from Secret Submission Post #774.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Parents, question.

[(Anonymous)]

nayrt

There's a difference between being aware of a family issue where one part of your life might be higher maintenance, and rolling the dice with a curse that will severely limit a kid's quality of life. If we all chose not to have kids because we fear they might have to be a little more responsible with their health... there wouldn't be a lot of humans on the planet right now (which, yes, I realize might not be a bad thing).

Ayrt doesn't mention the severity of the problems. We have no idea if it's chronic constipation or something that literally tears up the colon.

Also, notice they said kid. Singular. Not kids. If they knew there was a 90% chance of their kid inheriting, say, a rare bone cancer that might kill them in their teens, and they continued to have kids, THAT would be irresponsible.

Besides, eating healthful foods is just a good idea. If all you eat is McDonald's, and never even look at a vegetable unless it's deep fried, is it really a surprise if you get the runs all the time?

Re: Parents, question.

[(Anonymous)]

Yeah, there should be a lot less people on the planet. Birth control based on lactose intolerance alone would pretty much solve our population issue. And a lot of economic and human rights abuse issues too.

Re: Parents, question.

[(Anonymous)]

Whoa there Thanos

Re: Parents, question.

[(Anonymous)]

IKR

Re: Parents, question.

[(Anonymous)]

I object to that accusation. Thanos was using some random bullshit that wouldn't have solved the problems at all. Randomness, or the illusion thereof, might have let him sell it to himself, but it would have left all the problems he wanted to tackle and all the ones I want to tackle all intact. Fucking amateur. I'm talking specific and targeted public health measures which would actually work.

Re: Parents, question.

[(Anonymous)]

You don't seem to understand. I was being generous when comparing you to Thanos, instead of some other genocidal maniac who existed in recent history.

Re: Parents, question.

[(Anonymous)]

What complete and utter nonsense. And to choose lactose intolerance of all things. I'm sure it's totally a coincidence that most people with that condition live in Africa, South Asia and South America.

Re: Parents, question.

[(Anonymous)]

I don't want to have to learn Mandarin or Hindi in my seventies.

Re: Parents, question.

[(Anonymous)]

Are you aware lactose intolerance is mostly found outside of white populations? You really might want to rethink your criteria there, Adolf.

Re: Parents, question.

[(Anonymous)]

I love shitty arguments like this because they always show the poster's lack of education. Lactose intolerance is actually the NATURAL state of being. Drinking milk over the age of infancy is unnatural and developing lactose intolerance is the normal reaction of a body after not getting regular dosages of mother's milk after being weaned because the body shouldn't need to be able to dismantle lactose anymore.
I know this is likely a troll but damn, it's a dumb one.