[ SECRET POST #5431 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #5431 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 07 secrets from Secret Submission Post #777.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

when are you going to fuck off out of this comm no one likes you

[(Anonymous)]

So hard to hear a voice of reason in your cloud cuckoo land, eh?

[(Anonymous)]

“Voice of reason” lol. You have absolutely no self-awareness.

[(Anonymous)]

This thread has at least two people who don't know the target age group for the YA genre, so who lacks self-awareness here, hm?

[(Anonymous)]

Considering I was responding to the first anon who called the target demographic of YA novels “12 year olds” while also calling themselves the voice of reason, it’s still them. Where do you think you are? Because by throwing this silly “No U” at me, you’re unintentionally agreeing with the first anon and the others who don’t understand YA novel demographics.

[(Anonymous)]

SA

Also, you do know that the first anon(if it isn’t you) called YA novels “books for children”. Children’s books and YA books are a different demographic. And while 12 year olds are still children in many developmental ways, and so are early teens, there’s a reason the term preteen and teenager exists. 12-18 is a big demographic, and covers too many ages to call them books for children. It may seem pedantic, but so is your attempt at defining them as children’s books. They’re not books for college students either, so that anon is wrong, but the others weren’t. You’re not a voice of reason, you’re just grasping at straws. And you lack no self-awareness in calling yourself a voice of reason, it’s honestly hilarious.

And I don’t even disagree with you that NSFW works should be under a sock or orphaned to not interfere with professional works and the readerbase. I don’t think the people that disagree are deviants, because I’m not an anti who always uses the least charitable interpretation possible of strangers. So while I don’t disagree with your arguments in some ways, I think you have delusions of grandeur about how much more wise and reasonable you are compared to everyone else here. And you use shoddy semantics and ad hominem attacks against those who disagrees with you.

[(Anonymous)]

I agree that 12 year olds and, say, 8 year olds, are in a different place developmentally, but I don't think 12 year olds are at the place where an easy access to any and all porn is appropriate for them. I've seen what it leads to, and those are not very healthy places.

> because I’m not an anti who always uses the least charitable interpretation possible of strangers.

And I'm not an anti either, if your definition of an anti is a person who thinks people deserve to be harassed for fiction. In fact, I am a pro-shipper, using the definition coined and defined by pro-shippers as "a person who thinks that nobody deserves to get death threats and harassment for writing fiction". Though I rarely ever see people use these terms in the way they were defined.

[(Anonymous)]

NAYRT but it may shock you what I was easily able to find and even check out myself at the local library as a 12 year old pffft

[(Anonymous)]

And I read my mom's smutty book as a child. She got pissed off when I did and today I understand why she didn't enthusiastically hand it over to me.

AYRT

[(Anonymous)]

Well in that case, you’re alright in my book after all, nonny.