case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2021-12-04 04:19 pm

[ SECRET POST #5447 ]


⌈ Secret Post #5447 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 43 secrets from Secret Submission Post #779.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2021-12-05 03:43 pm (UTC)(link)
I can recognize that my second favourite book in my favourite series is probably the second worst book of the series from an objective point of view, but it's still my second favourite. You can recognize that something isn't great objectively but still love it.

(Anonymous) 2021-12-05 04:42 pm (UTC)(link)
What makes something “objectively good”? I’ve honestly never understood that. What can one possibly measure by, other than how much they liked it? (Or based on how many other people liked it, but I think that’s a good way to miss a lot of things one might like.)

(Anonymous) 2021-12-05 06:23 pm (UTC)(link)
There are skills involved in film-making, just as there are skills involved in singing, knitting, painting, building or any other craft. Some crafters execute those skills objectively better than others. Most people will agree that, objectively, Titanic is a better film than Sharknado. Subjectively? Different strokes for different folks.