case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2021-12-07 10:16 pm

[ SECRET POST #5450 ]


⌈ Secret Post #5450 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 22 secrets from Secret Submission Post #779.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: SA

(Anonymous) 2021-12-08 05:58 am (UTC)(link)
Very eloquent explanation. I'm not sure the AYRT deserved it though. Sounds like they're one of those fandom Puritans.

Re: SA

(Anonymous) 2021-12-08 01:46 pm (UTC)(link)
Asking why a 14 year old(who wouldn’t be allowed in a sex toy store in a lot of countries) was in a sex toy shop isn’t a question related to fandom though. Whether you think the question alone is Puritan, or that it didn’t deserve an answer is a different story, and one based on opinion. But it still wouldn’t make them a “fandom” Puritan, so I don’t know where that part came in.

Re: SA

(Anonymous) 2021-12-08 07:37 pm (UTC)(link)
The 14 year old in question was the person commenting, not a minor they were responsible for. The request to justify why they were in there had so many layers of puritanical bullshit to it.

Re: SA

(Anonymous) 2021-12-08 08:06 pm (UTC)(link)
I know? I never said the 14 year old was a minor they were responsible for. It’s pretty clear that they are telling this story about themselves when they were 14. And in a lot of countries, 14 would be considered a minor, and not let into a sex toy shop. But either way, they already answered that it’s because the owner didn’t stop them, so the question was answered.

I also never asked them to justify themselves, or passed judgment on them in any way. My comment was mainly pointing out how it’s weird to call someone a fandom Puritan when this anecdote doesn’t involve fandom at all.

Re: SA

(Anonymous) 2021-12-08 04:45 pm (UTC)(link)
I just actually was wondering what sex shops allowed obvious minors in but /shrug
AIRT actually explained it so...