case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2022-01-15 02:43 pm

[ SECRET POST #5489 ]


⌈ Secret Post #5489 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 38 secrets from Secret Submission Post #786.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
fizzyrose: (Default)

[personal profile] fizzyrose 2022-01-17 01:20 am (UTC)(link)
The problem is that those metrics are no longer guarantees of success, necessarily. Streaming platforms pay attention to shows which draw people to using their service and allocate funds to obtaining and producing shows which are either cheap or will draw attention. Once the initial draw of attention has been achieved there's no real incentive to continue making it or keep it around. Or so I understand. Because these shows aren't upheld by the number of people seeing ads on traditional T.V. there's no financial gain to keeping them going simply because people are watching it. Once you've got people on the platform or continuing to come back to use it (maintaining their subscription)...that's all that matters. So their model tends to be keep churning out new shiny things to attract attention but only keeping the huge shows running for multiple seasons.

I could be wrong on some specifics but that's generally the trend.