case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2022-01-21 04:58 pm

[ SECRET POST #5495 ]


⌈ Secret Post #5495 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.
[Cobra Kai]


__________________________________________________



04.
[The City & The City by China Miéville]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Stassi Schroeder from Vanderpump Rules]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Venture Bros]


__________________________________________________





















07. [WARNING for discussion of dubcon/underage]
























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #786.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Secrets you don't want to make...

(Anonymous) 2022-01-22 04:41 am (UTC)(link)
Uh, did you read the comment they were replying to? Because if anyone was pissing all over things it was that person.

Re: Secrets you don't want to make...

(Anonymous) 2022-01-22 01:33 pm (UTC)(link)
YEs, I read it. It was an unwarranted personal attack. Just like every single fucking other comment I post. There was no need for it and I'm sick of it. It is constant on here.

Re: Secrets you don't want to make...

(Anonymous) 2022-01-22 08:36 pm (UTC)(link)
You know, if you meet an asshole once, that's on them. If everyone you meet is an asshole, there's a good chance that at least part of the problem might lie with you.

Re: Secrets you don't want to make...

(Anonymous) 2022-01-22 09:05 pm (UTC)(link)
da

I can't tell if you're trolling, or are reading the wrong post, or if you sincerely believe that "you need to work on your reading comprehension" and "you make yourself look like an idiot" aren't things an asshole would say in response to a post where the commenter was doing nothing to warrant it.

Re: Secrets you don't want to make...

(Anonymous) 2022-01-22 09:12 pm (UTC)(link)
I think people were irritated that they revived an ongoing ugly wank about Age of Ultron in a particularly wanky way. I can see why that person got crabby, whether it was warranted or not.

Re: Secrets you don't want to make...

(Anonymous) 2022-01-23 10:41 am (UTC)(link)
And that justifies the anon calling that person a “joyless cunt” how?

And AYRT is saying the “if everyone you meet is an asshole, you’re the asshole” at them because they said every comment they post is constantly getting personal attacks thrown at them(I’m pretty sure that’s what they meant, even though they actually said every comment they post is a personal attack?). That’s very suspicious that everyone else is always being rude to them for no reason, almost like they’re not sharing something about it what they’re actually posting. So the asshole saying is completely applicable. I have no idea why you’re coming in with the “I don’t know if you’re reading the wrong post”, because AYRT’s response makes perfect sense.

I also don’t know how you can possibly think AYRT is trolling either. Maybe don’t throw the troll accusations without rhyme or reason, because that’s troll behavior too. And it’s fine if you think "you need to work on your reading comprehension" and "you make yourself look like an idiot" are unnecessarily rude. But you’re conveniently ignoring how the “joyless cunt” response is way worse and more inflammatory.

And “things an asshole would say in response to a post where the commenter was doing nothing to warrant it.”? As AYRT explained, the commenter did do something to warrant it, or at least warrant a response in a similar vein. I do think the response could have done without the insult, and the reading comprehension remark, sure. But that bit from AoU meaning Natasha is calling herself a monster because she can’t give birth has been debunked for years now, and is only brought up by ignorant people, or people looking to dig up old wank. So there’s reason to try to nip it in the bud just in case it’s the latter, because everyone’s sick of that wank that’s been around for over 5 years. But if that anon was truly ignorant of it being debunked, then personal attacks aren’t helpful. I’m not disagreeing with that.

TL;DR, that post might not have been the best, but it’s understandable in a way. The anon and the posts by them that you’re defending are way worse though.