Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2022-01-23 04:17 pm
[ SECRET POST #5497 ]
⌈ Secret Post #5497 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 33 secrets from Secret Submission Post #787.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
no subject
Anyway, I don't think it makes sense to suggest that grimdark's central mechanic can be defined by abstraction, especially in genre, wherein it's not necessarily the case that noblebright as applied rather than a writer actively playing with the trope is actually the mirror opposite of grimdark; there's a layer of interpretation there that simply can't be ignored. Like, people say that ASOIAF is grimdark, and the protagonists are actually capable of great change within the universe. I think the more popular use, wherein it's the difference between camp batman and ~realistic~ batman, wherein batman's ability to effect the universe does not change, but the philosophy of human nature does. Meanwhile, I don't think you would call BTVS grimdark, even though the slayer's purpose is never-fucking-ending. So I can't agree that that is the central mechanic, in that I don't think that's how it's being used.