Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2022-01-30 04:31 pm
[ SECRET POST #5504 ]
⌈ Secret Post #5504 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 26 secrets from Secret Submission Post #787.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2022-01-30 10:25 pm (UTC)(link)Best example is Lizzy, notably when she has to suck it up when Charlotte marries Mr Collins. She clearly sees Charlotteas her equal, and obviously Mr Collins as vastly inferior. Lizzy reacts badly to Charlotte choosing mundane practicalities over loftier ideals, as Lizzy has done. But she cares too much about Charlotte and learns to accept it.
Same with Emma and Harriet Smith marrying her farmer, and Marianne in pretty much all her dealings with Elinor, Willoughby, and Colonel Brandon.
In general, frivolity and vanity are shown negatively, but then those are not inherently female traits, nor can they be considered good traits for someone to have.
Or were you thinking of something else I've missed entirely, OP?
OP
(Anonymous) 2022-01-31 12:16 am (UTC)(link)The contrast between Lucy and the Dashwoods is that Lucy is straight up mercenary, where as Marianne and Elinor are more concerned with compatibility, which fair! But it seems clear that Lucy isn't in the Dashwood's class and it really smacks of despising any attempt to be above your class as a primary goal but specifically through the female sphere, rather than the mild commentary on the ways men attempt it.
Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2022-01-31 12:36 am (UTC)(link)OP
(Anonymous) 2022-01-31 12:39 am (UTC)(link)Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2022-01-31 02:37 am (UTC)(link)Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2022-01-31 01:19 pm (UTC)(link)Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2022-01-31 03:22 pm (UTC)(link)And I'm ALL ABOUT dragging Mr. Bennet for not saving more for his daughter's dowries (even if he'd had a son that son would have needed to support his mother and sisters which is a huge burden and their marriage prospects would still have been awful) but Mrs. Bennet's behavior is both completely understandable and an impediment to what she wants/the happiness of her daughters. Two things can be true at once.
But no really, I want to rag on Mr. Bennet all day.