[ SECRET POST #5504 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #5504 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 26 secrets from Secret Submission Post #787.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: OP

[(Anonymous)]

Wait, why is that risque? The robes would likely be full length with sleeves, they'd be less revealing than the dresses from the movie

OP

[(Anonymous)]

The implication of robes, to me, is a waistline cinch of either buttons or a belt, so bottom is pretty free and liable to open (if it closes all the way down...that's just a gown imo). That's far more revealing than typical dresses unless they have splits.

Re: OP

[(Anonymous)]

Aaaaah, I guess that's the confusion! I always imagined them as like monk's robes, so basically just a shapeless baggy smock.

Re: OP

[(Anonymous)]

Okay. I got it. You're confused because you made up your own definition of robes. That's kind of a you problem though.

Re: OP

[(Anonymous)]

Not OP
But wtf are you on, robes can be different

Re: OP

[(Anonymous)]

OP’s entire point is that there is only one kind of robe.

Re: OP

[(Anonymous)]

There are different types of robes and if you're wearing one that's liable to split open you would obviously wear other clothes underneath. How is this so difficult to understand?

Re: OP

[(Anonymous)]

Given that robes are used as the school uniforms in the book, and are generally described as the standard dress for wizardkind, regardless of gender, I'm not sure why the dress robes are suddenly the problem, as opposed to the school robes or others, unless it's specifically the word "dress" that's throwing you off.

Re: OP

[(Anonymous)]

That... is an extremely narrow definition of a word that describes garments that come in a lot of different varieties.

No, a waist cinch is not any kind of prerequisite for something to be called a robe, though some are. Think: long, loose, baggy, probably fastened in the front, generally worn over some kind of inner layer, frequently very modest.

Re: OP

[(Anonymous)]

So if that is the mental image of a robe you're working with, why do your male dress robes not have this same issue? You keep saying they make sense for men, do you picture them wearing something more than underwear under the robes, and if so, why wouldn't the same apply to female dress robes?

Re: OP

[(Anonymous)]

So to you, the problem is that someone could see a girl's cunt because you think she wouldn't be wearing anything under her dress robes. Why aren't you bringing up people potentially seeing a whole lot of dicks too, since boys are wearing dress robes too?