case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2022-01-30 04:31 pm

[ SECRET POST #5504 ]


⌈ Secret Post #5504 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 26 secrets from Secret Submission Post #787.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2022-01-31 07:28 am (UTC)(link)
Nah.

(Anonymous) 2022-01-31 08:14 am (UTC)(link)
Nobody has any idea what your pointless “nah” is referencing, considering AYRT said many things in their comment. But I guess you’re too good for elaborating on what it was you disagreed with.

(Anonymous) 2022-01-31 09:58 am (UTC)(link)
Pretty sure the dress/robe part, it's not that difficult to guess. Because even JKR, terfiness and all, and any potential "weird gender assumptions" can't be blamed for people not knowing the a dress robe is not a dress.

(Anonymous) 2022-02-01 07:36 am (UTC)(link)
It’s not difficult to guess, and I had a hunch that was what they disagreed with. And I’m not saying I agree with the original anon that the robes have anything to do with JKR’s general gender assumptions and TERFiness, because the dress robes make perfect sense to people that either know the history they’re inspired by, or are able to use Google if they don’t. So everyone but people like OP. I was just pointing out that their “Nah” was rendered meaningless by the fact that the anon they were replying to brought up two things, so simply saying “nah” isn’t helpful. It’s also not a great counter in general, and elaborating on why you believe someone is wrong is always better. But a simple no could be fine regardless if the person you’re replying to didn’t mention more than one thing that can be disagreed with. Then the “nah” just looks a bit dumb and pointless as a result. That’s what I was trying to get across, not that I thought it was hard to guess what they were disagreeing with.