Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2022-02-04 06:38 pm
[ SECRET POST #5509 ]
⌈ Secret Post #5509 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

[Milgram]
__________________________________________________
06. [SPOILERS]

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #787.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2022-02-05 02:56 am (UTC)(link)literally lots of people simply ship what they want in their own corners of fandom, but if you personally aren't one of the people dogpiling them for the sin ""straightwashing"" then OBVIOUSLY the only ones YOU hear about are going to be the obnoxious proactively defensive ones
no subject
(Anonymous) 2022-02-05 04:35 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2022-02-05 06:13 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2022-02-05 06:49 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2022-02-07 04:14 am (UTC)(link)AYRT
(Anonymous) 2022-02-07 06:14 am (UTC)(link)But also, this comment has nothing to do with how this thread has been going. The anon I was replying to thought the anon before them was calling them homophobic(or -ist/phobic in general) for saying that plenty of people still get homophobia for writing characters in non-canon gay relationships. I responded that I didn’t think they were calling them homophobic, just saying that characters writing gay characters in straight relationships by no means have the monopoly on being harassed. So again, in no way was I implying “heterophobia”, or that people writing gay characters in straight relationships have it worse, or even just as bad. I was basically saying the opposite to someone who thought they were being called homophobic when I don’t think they were. So I think your “oh no the hetrophobia of the situation :(“ would work better as a response to the anon above me.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2022-02-05 04:45 am (UTC)(link)Well said.