Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2022-02-20 04:19 pm
[ SECRET POST #5525 ]
⌈ Secret Post #5525 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 41 secrets from Secret Submission Post #791.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2022-02-21 07:51 pm (UTC)(link)Unless the immortal being looks old, then maybe it counts, lol.
It's silly and irrational, but it's such a fictional convention that a lot of people don't really feel the need to unpack it. Myself included. I mean, if treating the immense age gap between a human teenager and an immortal being seriously is something I want to do--something that will deepen my enjoyment of the story--then of course I'll do it. But if I don't feel like unpacking the reality of what a 17/104 age gap actually means, then I'm perfectly fine with accepting the irrational fictional convention of, like, shhh it's fine, he's a vampire, he looks young, it's whatever.
I mean, if the narrative itself is treating the age-gap genuinely seriously, then I'm probably going to treat it seriously, too. But if the narrative is basically handwaving it (the way most immortal!romance stories do), then I do not feel intellectually obligated to fight the narrative's take, unless I want to.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2022-02-21 11:10 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2022-02-21 11:38 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2022-02-21 11:23 pm (UTC)(link)Also there was that creepy flashback where Angel decided to start following Buffy around after spying on her sucking on a lollypop in the schoolyard for a bit.
Honestly, no one was into BtVS for the wholesome romantic relationships.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2022-02-22 12:02 am (UTC)(link)I honestly have so many more "uhh that's controversial" feelings from learning that Angel was 26/hundreds-of-years-undead when he got involved with 16yo Buffy than I ever had when I thought he was supposed to be 18/hundreds-of-years-undead. Lol!
there was that creepy flashback where Angel decided to start following Buffy around after spying on her sucking on a lollypop in the schoolyard for a bit.
OMG, I'm cackling. I honestly never would've framed it that way, and yet, your description is extremely accurate.
Honestly, no one was into BtVS for the wholesome romantic relationships.
IDK, I remember Buffy/Angel being very commonly characterized as True Love, and maybe not "wholesome" per se, but definitely pure and good and romantic--back in the late 90's and early 00's that is.
I myself was primarily a Spuffy shipper and was very much here for the fucked-up-ness of it all, but I shipped early-seasons Buffy/Angel, and most of the Bangel content I remember coming across at the time was very, like, Star-Crossed Tragic True Love.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2022-02-22 12:27 am (UTC)(link)