[ SECRET POST #5552 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #5552 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.





















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 36 secrets from Secret Submission Post #795.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Frustrations and venting

[(Anonymous)]

thats basically true, BUT if the person is wary, it can trigger the nocebo effect, which i'm pretty sure is the case here.
unless the salts or the Release form is different, then it'sca different story.

Re: Frustrations and venting

[(Anonymous)]

DA - I mean, when I went from the name brand of a birth control to the no name that was explicitly stated as being chemically identical, my back broke out, and stayed broken out until I switched back to name brand, at which point it promptly cleared up again. I was curious (plus the no name was cheaper), so a few months later I tried another round of the no name, and once again, bacne like woah for three months, then no more bacne once I switched back.

That ain't no placebo effect.

Personally I think if you're getting benefits from a drug which the drug is not specifically designed to provide (such as acne treatment from a BC, or ADHD treatment from a drug for treating sleep disorders), then it wouldn't surprise me if no-name variants weren't adequately tested to see how those specific benefits held up across the board. Because those specific benefits aren't something the drug officially provides in the first place.