[ SECRET POST #5589 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #5589 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.


















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 28 secrets from Secret Submission Post #800.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

It's marginal.

This is the thing with categories. They don't exist in nature. We invent them. There are very few categories that actually are as stark and black-and-white as we think of them. Oklahoma is Southern in some ways and not in others. It's not a core southern state but it's also not unreasonable to describe it as Southern; it's not that much less southern than Texas or Arkansas, both of which people are usually comfortable calling Southern.

[(Anonymous)]

Arkansas is completely The South. It is full on high trash South. Texas, once you get away from the coasts and bayous is a lot more marginal than Arkansas. Texas needs to be more than one state.

Hey, Liberal Texans, both of you, quit talking about how Texas is turning blue, it'll never happen. Focus on splitting Texas into three or more different states instead. Make one all the liberal centers and leave the rest to the GOP.

[(Anonymous)]

that would be bad, because low-population states are systematically advantaged in the American political system. so splitting Texas into 3 smaller states, of which 1 is blue and the other 2 are red, would have the net effect of making Republicans stronger nationally. from this point of view, it would make way more sense to split California into multiple states. other blue states are generally hard to split because they usually only have 1 really large city - so for instance, any way you split up New York or Illinois, if you leave NYC or Chicago intact you probably don't get multiple blue states. Massachusetts might be doable I guess, western Mass is more conservative than the rest of the rest of the state but still blue overall.