Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2022-04-28 07:22 pm
[ SECRET POST #5592 ]
⌈ Secret Post #5592 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04. [repeat]
__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 07 secrets from Secret Submission Post #800.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2022-04-29 02:21 am (UTC)(link)All of the failings of the films is on the filmmakers, to include casting her.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2022-04-29 07:37 am (UTC)(link)You say it’s a failing of the filmmakers for casting her. What are the filmmakers actually at fault for? What was their failing in this regard? Why shouldn’t they have casted her? Just because she didn’t look 1 for 1 to the book’s description doesn’t mean she was unfit for the role. Especially because she pulled it off well in the actual acting department, appearance be damned. And they still did make her hair close enough to the books, even if it was clearly not Emma’s normal hairstyle. But she was cast when she was a child, how was anyone supposed to know she’d grow up to be as attractive as she is, the filmmakers included? This is such a weird take.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2022-04-29 09:04 am (UTC)(link)And when I say “And they still did make her hair close enough to the books, even if it was clearly not Emma’s normal hairstyle”, I of course mean they made her hair close enough for the first couple of movies. I’m not pretending they didn’t straighten out her hair later.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2022-04-29 08:39 pm (UTC)(link)