case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2022-06-01 04:31 pm

[ SECRET POST #5626 ]


⌈ Secret Post #5626 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.



__________________________________________________



08.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 19 secrets from Secret Submission Post #805.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

DA

(Anonymous) 2022-06-02 02:58 am (UTC)(link)
And being a condescending prick is helping the situation how?

Re: DA

(Anonymous) 2022-06-02 07:00 am (UTC)(link)
The other anon (or people with the same opinion) have been condescending pricks all over this secret's comments so why don't you ask them?

Re: DA

(Anonymous) 2022-06-02 07:26 am (UTC)(link)
Nayrt

Just because they were a prick first doesn’t mean acting like a condescending dickbag is suddenly taking the high road.

Seriously you sound childish with this “but they started it!”. And they weren’t being condescending first.

Belligerent and quick to jump to conclusions about kallanda_lee’s intent? Sure. But condescending? Nah.

I don’t need to ask anyone anything because it’s clear that trying to fight someone being a prick by acting like a different kind of prick is dumb and makes you look just as bad.

And what do you even mean “(or people with the same opinion)”? I haven’t seen anyone else say the same opinions anywhere else in the thread. Just because the subject was about women characters overall doesn’t mean it’s the same opinion other people have elsewhere in the thread.

Re: DA

(Anonymous) 2022-06-02 07:41 am (UTC)(link)
The same opinion as in "you're all just dumb trolls who intentionally misunderstood the secret" and yes, it's perfectly legitimate to meet condescension with condescension. Fuck being the bigger person, if you talk to people like they're idiots just for not agreeing with your interpretation of the secret, be prepared for this to be echoed back at you.

Re: DA

(Anonymous) 2022-06-02 08:21 am (UTC)(link)
It’s funny that you use that as an example of “the same opinions”. Because they’re completely different opinions than the one the anon talking to kallanda_lee was talking about first off.

And being willfully obtuse about the secret and refusing to consider that position could be wrong so you could throw snarky zingers was actually being the condescending ass first.

So it’s very revealing that you used that as an example of others opinions. While lumping all the different opinions than yours together and generalizing everyone who has those opinions. Saying things like that makes it look like you think anyone who disagrees and speaks against your opinions is automatically wrong. And shouldn’t do so.

And it’s good that you have no intention of being the bigger person. Because nobody would make the mistake of thinking you are. You’re actually coming off way worse than the people you’re arguing against and accusing of jumping down people’s throats lol.

And you’re talking to me about “if you talk to people like they're idiots just for not agreeing with your interpretation of the secret, be prepared for this to be echoed back at you.” as if I didn’t already say I wasn’t the anon you were replying to. That’s what Nayrt means.

Re: DA

(Anonymous) 2022-06-02 09:23 am (UTC)(link)
General you. It's a thing.
And I was explicitly talking about the whole secret's comments, not just this thread, in case you missed it. And fun fact: you're doing exactly the same thing you're accusing me of. Generalizing and making assumptions that clearly, all anons who don't share your opinion are wrong and just wilfully obtuse (which is apparent when you write "being willfully obtuse about the secret and refusing to consider that position could be wrong" because clearly, there can only be your opinion and the wrong opinion). You're not as smart as you think you are.

Re: DA

(Anonymous) 2022-06-02 10:09 am (UTC)(link)
You're not as smart as you think you are.

That’s some grade a projection to go with your nonsense and goalpost moving. Nice try, but maybe actually make sense next time you attempt a No U.

Re: DA

(Anonymous) 2022-06-02 10:20 am (UTC)(link)
Psst. English isn’t everyone’s first language, and not everyone knows about the general you.

Re: DA

(Anonymous) 2022-06-02 08:40 am (UTC)(link)
Yo, man, just take a chill pill already. Like you're jumping down everyones throats for no reason. Interpreting something differently/having a different opinion than the one you're so set on is not a personal attack. Big breaths now, in... out... you can do it.

Re: DA

(Anonymous) 2022-06-02 10:19 am (UTC)(link)
Nah, they’re right. You’re accusing everyone of exactly what you’re doing with no sense of self-awareness. You have your head so far up your ass, you could do your own colonoscopy.