case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2022-06-11 04:09 pm

[ SECRET POST #5636 ]


⌈ Secret Post #5636 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Met Gala]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Mr Ballen on Youtube]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Satoru Gojo from Jujutsu Kaisen]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Twisted Kaiju Theater]


__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.



__________________________________________________



08.








Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 50 secrets from Secret Submission Post #807.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2022-06-12 01:07 am (UTC)(link)
There is a difference between "technically there's no hard canonical evidence they're not ace" and actual representation. Maybe some people don't care about that difference, but many people do. And considering that ace people can count their examples of mainstream rep on one hand (in all the media I've consumed I have only ever found two canonically ace characters), it's pretty damn understandable that OP has gotten their hopes up that this extremely popular mainstream pairing that seems like it actually could well be a canonically ace pairing, is actually a canonically ace pairing.

(Anonymous) 2022-06-12 01:26 am (UTC)(link)
Exactly. I feel like there are always comments on secrets like this where people are like "but there are plenty of things out there without sex, just go watch/read them, stop being so picky!" but...that's not the point. There's a difference between "can be seen as asexual because there's nothing to contradict it" and actually intentionally meant to be (and stated to be, regardless of what specific wording is used) asexual, and the latter is something we almost never see. To me, it's an important distinction.

(Anonymous) 2022-06-12 05:53 am (UTC)(link)
Thank you.

(Anonymous) 2022-06-12 01:05 pm (UTC)(link)
This!