Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2022-07-01 08:07 pm
[ SECRET POST #5656 ]
⌈ Secret Post #5656 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05. [SPOILERS for Obi Wan]

__________________________________________________
06. [WARNING for discussion of sexual harassment]

__________________________________________________
07. [WARNING for discussion of sexual harassment]

__________________________________________________
08. [WARNING for non-con]

__________________________________________________
09. [WARNING for discussion of sexual assault]

__________________________________________________
10. [WARNING for discussion of domestic violence]

[Hasan Piker]
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #809.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Why don't we have robot pets yet??
(Anonymous) 2022-07-02 12:25 am (UTC)(link)Re: Why don't we have robot pets yet??
(Anonymous) 2022-07-02 12:31 am (UTC)(link)That is to say, both the physical aesthetics and the personality of mass produced robots is not yet up to the standard we expect of a 'pet'. There's an inherent fakeness that most people can't look past. At least not yet, who can say where we'll be in a decade or so in the field. But money will always be a factor when purchasing a 'pet' (household companion/family member) as opposed to a 'toy' (something that can be casually tossed in the trash when the owner grows bored, though I suppose it must be said that there are people out there that treat their live pets as disposable).