case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2022-07-09 02:46 pm

[ SECRET POST #5664 ]


⌈ Secret Post #5664 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.








Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 39 secrets from Secret Submission Post #811.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2022-07-10 03:48 am (UTC)(link)
To the land of danmei were danmei shows are actually highly censored or don't get released at all because they don't pass censorship, several danmei authors have either "disappeared" or are known to be in jail for writing it...and the list goes on?
Yes.

Just because danmei is popular in writing and manhua (which appears to be a bit of a loophole and the way it's going these days, it's probably just a matter of time until they change that) doesn't mean the ridiculously homophobic censorship laws aren't real.

(Anonymous) 2022-07-10 04:17 am (UTC)(link)
Not sure how much of it isn't "fairytale for foreigners" considering how the genre keeps growing, spreading and going international. And regardless, pretty sure that 20 years ago the US was known for censoring Asian (as in Japanese) cartoons pretty heavily. So... I find it incredibly ill intentioned to single out and use the Chinese (and/or Indonesian) market as an excuse for any type of, oh, cultural Christian morality based censorship.

(Anonymous) 2022-07-10 06:53 am (UTC)(link)
Wait, are you trying to imply the facts listed above aren't true?
Yikes, you are naive.

(Anonymous) 2022-07-10 09:35 am (UTC)(link)
do you actually have the gall to talk to people like this irl or is this internet tough-guy persona your outlet

(Anonymous) 2022-07-10 11:13 am (UTC)(link)
Sorry, are you actually implying that calling someone naive for saying "I bet all the factual stories about censorship and human rights violations in China are just fairytales" is too harsh? Because yes, I absolutely would tell someone irl they're full of shit if they said that to me, just like I'd tell that to someone who, for example, is a flat earther, anti-vaxxer or other conspiracy bullshit.

(Anonymous) 2022-07-10 01:41 pm (UTC)(link)
love how you're framing your behavior, is that really how it's going in your head? like you're looking at the convo and go "i called someone naive, how could anyone find that harsh?"

(Anonymous) 2022-07-10 02:45 pm (UTC)(link)
No? Actually, naive was far too nice for the bullshit airt spouted. So yeah, naive in this context was not harsh at all compared to what I could have said.

(Anonymous) 2022-07-10 11:13 am (UTC)(link)
Is this your troll internet persona or are you really this dumb irl?

(Anonymous) 2022-07-10 01:39 pm (UTC)(link)
look at you go, you badass

(Anonymous) 2022-07-10 02:46 pm (UTC)(link)
Look at you go, you moron.