Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2022-08-18 04:29 pm
[ SECRET POST #5704 ]
⌈ Secret Post #5704 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

[Yakuza: Like a Dragon]
__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

[Azure Striker Gunvolt 3]
__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

[Yurukill: The Calumniation Games]
__________________________________________________
10.

[I Am Magicami]
__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 15 secrets from Secret Submission Post #816 .
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2022-08-19 09:49 pm (UTC)(link)Do we exclude pokemon as a fandom because it was made to sell cards? I.e., where is the cut off between brand and content? And more than that, if there is a significant following and content made for something you find trivial, and very little for something you find legitimate, why would fandom A be excluded and fandom B be included?
It feels much more reasonable to describe something as having a fandom based on how many fans it has and the content (meta or otherwise) they produce.
Doesn't stop you personally dismissing fast food fandoms as worthy of respect. But trying to say certain fandoms are objectively not fandoms just based on your opinion of them isn't gonna work.