[ SECRET POST #5709 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #5709 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.



__________________________________________________



08.



__________________________________________________



09.



__________________________________________________



10.



__________________________________________________



11.



__________________________________________________



12.



__________________________________________________



13.



__________________________________________________



14.








Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 44 secrets from Secret Submission Post #817 .
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Everyone online who's used the words "sexualizes minors" when talking about fic turned out to be an anti. If someone says it in those words, they never stop at not liking the fic. They accuse people do as little as don't hate it of being pedophiles and usually more. So tough break OP, but if you use anti dogwhistles I'm going to call you an anti. If you're really not one, try saying "I don't like underage."

[(Anonymous)]

+1, "sexualises minors" instead of "I don't like reading about underage characters in sexual situations" is a classic anti phrase.

[(Anonymous)]

This. No one is going to jump down your throat for saying "I'm not into smutty fic about underage characters."

[(Anonymous)]

Yep. It comes down to personal preference of the reader ("welp, not my thing!") vs sweeping moral judgement on the writer ("your writing DOES this thing, so it's bad"). It can seem like a small difference in the grand scheme, but it really does help indicate intent.

Question...

[(Anonymous)]

What if it said "sexually objectifies minors" instead?

I'm curious if "sexually objectifies sex workers" is an anti dogwhistle too.

Re: Question...

[(Anonymous)]

1) same
2) that's a weird hangup to have but yeah.