case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2022-09-18 04:26 pm

[ SECRET POST #5735 ]


⌈ Secret Post #5735 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.



__________________________________________________



08.



__________________________________________________



09.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 46 secrets from Secret Submission Post #821.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2022-09-18 09:45 pm (UTC)(link)
You mean more evidence than the OP gave for alleging people get called antis for this neutral statement all the time?

(Anonymous) 2022-09-18 09:47 pm (UTC)(link)
nayrt

Yes, because fandom!secrets require extensive screencaps and evidence, rather than just being a (usually short) statement of opinion.

(Anonymous) 2022-09-18 09:50 pm (UTC)(link)
And the only thing I said in the original comment was basically "Depends on the context". Why is any evidence necessary for that, again?