[ SECRET POST #5752 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #5752 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.



__________________________________________________



08.



__________________________________________________



09.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 23 secrets from Secret Submission Post #823.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Isn't there a genuine literary distinction?

[(Anonymous)]

Like a graphic novel is complete story, the same as a text-based novel, just using images to tell part of the story. And a comic book is one part of larger serialized story.

Re: Isn't there a genuine literary distinction?

[(Anonymous)]

Sure, but that's a distinction that doesn't matter very much in most contexts. So it's still confusing if that's the definition that you're using and you insist on drawing a hard and fast line between the two things.

Re: Isn't there a genuine literary distinction?

[(Anonymous)]

Originally, a comic book was a serial release and you could later get a collected edition. A graphic novel was a single, longer-form entire story. There was some overlap in that some comics (e.g. Watchmen) were published chapter by chapter but were intended and mostly read as a graphic novel, but you can say the same thing about Dickens' novels. However, the publication of Sandman and other similar works from Vertigo started to blur this line in the late 80s/early 90s, and since then the line has been very wobbly.