case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2022-10-22 04:06 pm

[ SECRET POST #5769 ]


⌈ Secret Post #5789 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.



__________________________________________________



08.



__________________________________________________



09.



__________________________________________________



10.



__________________________________________________



11.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 69 secrets from Secret Submission Post #826.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2022-10-22 09:51 pm (UTC)(link)
DA

If that were true, the publishers of Twilight would have sued the living shit out of E L James.

(Anonymous) 2022-10-22 10:18 pm (UTC)(link)
Not quite the same. You can't copyright an idea (in this case an abusive romance), only the expression of an idea. So if EL James had published her AU romance about Bella and Edward, then yes it would infringe on Meyer's expression of that idea in those characters. But one you file the serial numbers off (if you do it well enough), you are left with a different expression of the same idea, which isn't an infringement. That's my understanding, anyway.

/not a laywer