[ SECRET POST #5789 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #5789 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.



__________________________________________________



08.



__________________________________________________



09.
[Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart]


__________________________________________________





















10. [SPOILERS for She-Hulk]




__________________________________________________



11. [WARNING for discussion of suicide]

[Extraordinary Attorney Woo]


__________________________________________________



12. [WARNING for discussion of rape]

































Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #828.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Two random questions

[(Anonymous)]

Yes, that would mess up the solvability of the cube. I found the answer here:

https://www.quora.com/Is-it-possible-for-a-Rubiks-Cube-to-become-unsolvable-if-it-has-not-been-taken-apart

If this is something you're thinking of inserting in a fic, then keep in mind that, judging by the top answer given on the page I linked you to, a very savvy solver will likely recognize by their flawed solve that one or more corners have been twisted, and may be able to simply twist it back into place and solve the puzzle despite the attempted sabotage.

I know how to solve a Rubik's Cube, but sadly I don't have the kind of spatial intelligence to grasp the "why" of it all. You just follow a number of protocols in the right order and it gives you a solve. So I'm not qualified to answer the question myself. But the answer I linked you to definitely sounds like a person who understands Rubik's Cubes beyond the surface protocol of how to solve them.