case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2022-11-14 06:27 pm

[ SECRET POST #5792 ]


⌈ Secret Post #5792 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.



__________________________________________________



08.



__________________________________________________



09.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 40 secrets from Secret Submission Post #829.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2022-11-16 02:13 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah I think my main point at this stage would just be that I do think that OP did moderate their statement, to wit, they acknowledged that it wasn't rational or founded in facts. I think that does constitute moderation of expression in a meaningful and substantive way.

(Anonymous) 2022-11-16 03:44 am (UTC)(link)
My opinion aside, from the weight of the majority of comments on this secret, it seems that that moderation was not sufficient to meaningfully nullify the rudeness of the content of the secret