case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2022-12-20 07:07 pm

[ SECRET POST #5828 ]


⌈ Secret Post #5828 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 25 secrets from Secret Submission Post #834.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2022-12-21 05:05 am (UTC)(link)
I can relate. I have little patience for arguments that claim that because the author wrote in that some character has a marginalized identity in common with me, that's the one I have to identify with and focus on. Particularly when those characters are poorly made - which they often are. It seems like a fairly transparent attempt to contain slash, like "here, we magnanimously gave you these designated gays, now leave the rest of the cast alone for their very important heterosexual makeouts." And then, you know ... scolding us if that doesn't work as planned. Especially when it's like everyone in fandom shared a look and unanimously went "nah. We want THAT GUY."