[ SECRET POST #5836 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #5836 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Designing Women]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Arcane]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Mob Psycho 100]


__________________________________________________



05.
[bungou stray dogs; skk 'soukoku' - dazai/chuuya]


__________________________________________________



06.
[High on Life]


__________________________________________________



07.















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 14 secrets from Secret Submission Post #835.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I don't know how you got that from what I said. Of course it's not that. My point was that a lot of people say that because they, themselves, do not know yet that they're also capable of being into guys (or girls, if they're a girl). Not everyone who is attracted to any gender necessarily "really wants to get with" anyone. All you need to be the sexual orientation you are is the capability to feel attraction. No eagerness required!

[(Anonymous)]

I got that from the very first line of your comment, which most readers would generally assume to be something you considered important:

"Saying he's not into guys isn't technically proof of straightness either."

It's not proof that he's not straight either. It is, in fact, a data point towards straightness.

You're right - sexual identity can be a journey. If there are other data points, like... never actually goes out with girls, or, spends a lot of time thinking about male friends' physicality, sure, we the audience can make some inferences. And that journey of exploration can be a fascinating thing.

But if the *only thing* we know about a character is a clear statement they make about their sexuality. Well. I'm going to assume that they are, in canon, intended to be what they say they are.

If we're talking shipping? Shipping is usually a little bit AU, so knock yourself out. But god. If we're trying to make a conclusion about what a character canonically *is?* What the author intended them to be? Then unambiguous statements they make about themselves are a place to start, not... some kind of inconvenience to be immediately ignored.