[ SECRET POST #5847 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #5847 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.



__________________________________________________



08.



__________________________________________________



09.

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 51 secrets from Secret Submission Post #837.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

AYRT

I see your point on the differences between an analogue and OP's point. I also disagree that Data is a 'bad' imitation. But I suppose I continue to sympathise with OP as I can understand how a fan might find Data annoying because of how he functions very similarly to Spock's character in episodes where his larger arc isn't relevant.

I also remember thinking that Data seemed quite emotional for an android that supposedly didn't understand human emotions - something that didn't bother me as I liked his character, but I could see bothering someone who was expecting more consistent 'robotic' characterisation.

The schtick criticism makes me think OP may be on the hard sci fi end of the Trek fandom spectrum, which does fit with their frustrations with Data as a character.

[meadowphoenix]

yeah, if OP thinks Data is annoying and not androidic enough, fair. my objection is strictly about the type of comparison to spock.