[ SECRET POST #5873 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #5873 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.
[Demons Roots]


__________________________________________________

















05. [WARNING for discussion of antisemitism]




__________________________________________________



06. [WARNING for discussion of transphobia (possibly, just to be safe)]




__________________________________________________



07. [WARNING for discussion of transphobia]























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #840.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I don't know why my comment prompted this response but... ok?

[feotakahari]

I just feel like people look at the problem wrong. Someone gets nervous and asks “What if my story sucks?” and then people say “It won’t suck,” when they should say “It doesn’t matter if it sucks.” The distinction is important, because when people realize they shouldn’t have harassed someone, they decide that person’s story must not have sucked after all, and then harass the next person whose story they think sucks. (Like that mediocre story about the person who identifies as an attack helicopter, which people decided was good after they felt guilty about screaming at the author.)