Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2023-02-24 06:51 pm
[ SECRET POST #5894 ]
⌈ Secret Post #5894 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

[One Dark Window]
__________________________________________________
06. [WARNING for discussion of sexual assault/rape]

__________________________________________________
07. [WARNING for discussion of revenge porn]

__________________________________________________
08. [WARNING for discussion of body horror]

[Project Moon/Library of Ruina]
__________________________________________________
09. [WARNING for discussion of transphobia, antisemitism, suicide]

[Hogwarts Legacy]
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #843.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

OP
(Anonymous) 2023-02-25 07:36 am (UTC)(link)Person2: Not every show has to be GoT grimdark you know
How would you interpret person2's response? Keep in mind that person1 never said anything about the show's tone, much less how they wanted it to be. Personally I can see two options:
A) Person2 thinks GoT grimdark = good writing, therefore you can have either lighthearted or well written, so person1 is dumb for expecting both.
B) Person2 assumes person1 thinks GoT grimdark = good writing, despite them never giving any indication of it, simply because they're criticizing a lighter toned show.
This line is constantly used to defend bad writing. This secret is about that. I know that "Not every show needs to be Game of Thrones" is supposed to mean "shows can be good without needing to be like GoT" but it's almost never used that way. It's more often used to shut down (usually) legitimate criticism about writing quality.
Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2023-02-25 04:55 pm (UTC)(link)Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2023-02-25 05:27 pm (UTC)(link)