[ SECRET POST #5912 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #5912 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.



__________________________________________________



08.



__________________________________________________



09.



__________________________________________________



10.



















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 32 secrets from Secret Submission Post #846.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[meadowphoenix]

largely people's framework is capitalistic success, while largely disliking capitalistic consequences. So "ruin" is usually the inability to make money because a product was starved of consumers through social channels (aka reputational channels), even though the latter is the main tool for a consumer to register disapproval.

Because people dislike capitalistic consequences, they tend to use the language of collective theories as replacement. So "holding someone accountable" is to treat a person as if they are a community member who merely needs be brought in line, non-punitively, back to community ideal. Mind you, capitalistic consequences aren't punitive unless you feel people are entitled to capitalistic success. But for people who have been brought up in a society in which your ability to make money largely determines your social worth...

But the "punitive" nature of any action is usually what people are trying to redirect. I don't think you can successfully have one framework but use the solutions of directly contradictory one, especially since none of this is ever done in a consistent way across all similar "wrong-doers", but I understand why people want to do so.