case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2023-03-30 05:53 pm

[ SECRET POST #5928 ]


⌈ Secret Post #5928 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.
[Far Cry]



__________________________________________________



07.
[Starry Love]



__________________________________________________



08.



__________________________________________________



09.



__________________________________________________



10.























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 11 secrets from Secret Submission Post #848.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
meadowphoenix: (Default)

[personal profile] meadowphoenix 2023-03-31 07:05 am (UTC)(link)
my point is a) syntactic understanding what OP is expecting imo, and b) why are you framing this as an issue of novelty? what AI chat responds with, if it's allowed, is the output of algorithms that require it to parse a prompt through similarity matrices and typify based on that that parsing. there is no way in such a situation for anything novel to not be similar to its training data, and nothing i said implied that they were distinct. why are they for you?