case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2023-04-16 08:34 pm

[ SECRET POST #5945 ]


⌈ Secret Post #5945 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.
[Star Wars (Prequels)]



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.



__________________________________________________



08.





























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 46 secrets from Secret Submission Post #850.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2023-04-17 09:28 am (UTC)(link)
You can argue that it would be a better political course of action for her to try to make the change; maybe that's so.

But I still don't think it's morally blameworthy for her to disobey the law.

(Anonymous) 2023-04-17 01:40 pm (UTC)(link)
I think it is very morally blame worthy for a politician to disobey the law, in even down right immoral for a politician to disobey what they consider a bad law without publicly trying to change it. In fact that sort of political selfserving hypocrisy is fairly close to the top of my list of political misbehavior.

(Anonymous) 2023-04-17 03:03 pm (UTC)(link)
Rules for thee, but not for me.

(Anonymous) 2023-04-17 07:06 pm (UTC)(link)
My understanding was that this was an ethical prohibition placed by the Jedi Order on its members, not a law per se? So even if you want to argue that there's a moral commitment to obey even irrational laws for rule of law reasons, I don't think it would apply here.