[ SECRET POST #5946 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #5946 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.



__________________________________________________



08.





























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 38 secrets from Secret Submission Post #850.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

SA

And there’s nothing wrong with not being able to read something, or pointing it out that it’s hard to read. People do it here all the time. That’s why people ask for transcripts. Because while it can be hard to read a secret that has a lot of text, especially if the background image doesn’t help, there are ways around it like zooming in and transcripts. Criticizing a secret’s design is fine, if it’s constructive. There’s nothing constructive about “Try making a readable secret.”, it’s just unnecessarily rude. I didn’t call the original anon a dick because they couldn’t read the secret, I called them that because their way of getting that across was hostile to the secret maker. Who’s doing this for free to keep the community alive, and doesn’t deserve mean comments instead of constructive criticism. I have considered that using the word “dick” might have been too harsh, but it’s not because they weren’t acting rude.