[ SECRET POST #5953 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #5953 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.

























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 25 secrets from Secret Submission Post #851.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[fscom]

04. https://i.imgur.com/2uq7qek.png

[(Anonymous)]

No, definitely not. The thing with Sisko is that he has his own moral code that he sticks to closely. He's fiercely independent in terms of his morals. So, yes, he'll do things that other Starfleet officers might not do. But he isn't going to be a tool of a group like Section 31. See also, the whole coup plotline.

[(Anonymous)]

Agencies collapsing the plans of rival agencies to prevent them gaining too much power is a classic move by corrupt conspiracies though.

[(Anonymous)]

Someone around here really hates Sisco. And no, he's not part of Section 31. This doesn't even make any sense.

[(Anonymous)]

SA

Sisko. Sorry.

[(Anonymous)]

I suspect its one of the people with a pickle up their nose about 'DS9 stole their idea from babylon 5 >:[' thing.

[(Anonymous)]

AYRT

They did, but then they made it their own. And both shows are awesome.

[(Anonymous)]

I mean, if Sisko *was* in Section 31, I agree that this would be the time to have recruited him. But as he came out of that grief and trauma, I think he would have made Section 31 a whole lot better. Both morally and functionally.

[(Anonymous)]

Now there's an interesting series idea. Instead of yet another hero corrupted into a villain arc, a Lawful Good character reforming and rebuilding a Lawful Neutral/Lawful Evil organization, without compromising their ideals. Not enough of those, I think.

[philstar22]

Now I want someone to write this as an AU.

[(Anonymous)]

AYRT Yeah, the thing with this secret is that DS9 does in fact show Sisko in morally dubious situations, and in situations where he has great power (with the Prophets) and what choices he makes. He doesn't always make the right choice, but when he doesn't, he regrets that and learns from it: I really liked that In The Pale Moonlight let him get a great result from his corrupt behaviour rather than going for the cheap and easy moral lesson and having him fail. And yet he didn't go further down that path.

[(Anonymous)]

He does, on screen, commit at least four warcrimes over the course of the series. It isn't a lot, but it is weird it happened four times. which he got promoted for. And he said he supported Julian bringing down S31, but his next thing was persuading Julian to drop talking about it in public to keep it all private, then he didn't really do anything but Sloan kept showing up. It is circumstantial, but I can see that reading.