case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2023-04-29 04:52 pm

[ SECRET POST #5958 ]


⌈ Secret Post #5958 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.
[Succession, Roman Roy]



__________________________________________________



04.
[minecraft youtube?]



__________________________________________________



05.
[Green Hell]



__________________________________________________



06.
[Lost Ruins]
























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 30 secrets from Secret Submission Post #852.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2023-04-30 12:25 am (UTC)(link)
I don't think there is any evidentiary process that American police can't find a way of fucking up, whether through malice or incompetence
philstar22: (Default)

[personal profile] philstar22 2023-04-30 12:32 am (UTC)(link)
Entirely accurate. But the fucking up version of DNA testing usually is one of two things: 1. A lab tech deciding to make police happy by finding false positives or 2. police refusing to test or hiding or lying about the results.

(Anonymous) 2023-04-30 01:17 am (UTC)(link)
And let's be real. Number 1 is less "lab tech decides to make police happy" and more "police offers lab tech financial or other compensation to find false positives," because if lab tech gets caught out they've destroyed their career and are also going to jail when the police department throws them under the bus. And given that the bulk of DNA analysis done by crime labs is still connected to sexual assault cases, the police are typically less incentivized to bribe DNA analysts than, for example, drug chemists.
philstar22: (Default)

[personal profile] philstar22 2023-04-30 01:19 am (UTC)(link)
Yes to all this.

(Anonymous) 2023-04-30 02:02 am (UTC)(link)
Admittedly, all of this sounds like the premise for an intriguing movie.