case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2023-04-29 04:52 pm

[ SECRET POST #5958 ]


⌈ Secret Post #5958 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.
[Succession, Roman Roy]



__________________________________________________



04.
[minecraft youtube?]



__________________________________________________



05.
[Green Hell]



__________________________________________________



06.
[Lost Ruins]
























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 30 secrets from Secret Submission Post #852.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2023-04-30 01:43 am (UTC)(link)
But as I understand it, "user-submitted genetic samples" doesn't mean the samples come from people who intended to donate them to a policing database. It's people using DNA testing services like 23AndMe out of personal curiosity, but then the cops are given access.

There are major ethical/privacy issues that I wouldn't trust a TV show to handle well. It would just end up being more copaganda.

(Anonymous) 2023-04-30 02:06 am (UTC)(link)
Most of the companies like 23andMe don't actually cooperate with law enforcement; you usually have to voluntarily submit your data to one of the few that does (like GEDMatch) and for most of them even then you have to actively opt-in to the law enforcement search. So the individuals that match usually have actively chosen to donate to police.

The issue is that just because Aunt Karen consented to helping the cops doesn't mean that Uncle Bart did, but Aunt Karen's DNA matching is close enough to let anyone who wants to find Uncle Bart, and with genetic genealogy even Third-Cousin-Twice Removed Egbert is.

(The other issue is government trying to force sites like 23andMe to share data whether they want to or not.)

(Anonymous) 2023-04-30 11:29 am (UTC)(link)
Given 23andme's historical issues with data privacy and communication of how they keep said data private, I can see them buckling on this one really quick.

https://d3.harvard.edu/platform-digit/submission/23andme-losing-at-digital-privacy/