[ SECRET POST #5958 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #5958 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.
[Succession, Roman Roy]



__________________________________________________



04.
[minecraft youtube?]



__________________________________________________



05.
[Green Hell]



__________________________________________________



06.
[Lost Ruins]
























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 30 secrets from Secret Submission Post #852.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

It's not acceptable as court evidence, which is what we're talking about today. It won't be anytime in the near future, because as you said, it's neither easy (read: cost effective) or reliable. And DNA evidence is never the only evidence used to convict, especially in murder trials. Could this theoretical scenario be used to convict people in the far future? Possibly. But if you're counting down the days until that happens, I hope you've got good genes, because most people here today will either be dead or senile by then.

[(Anonymous)]

Those twelve cells were considered good enough in 2021 that everyone considers the case solved!

Not a lot of those DNA-only genetic genealogy cases have gone to court, but that's because they're often cold cases and the matches are either dead or serving life sentences (or recent enough that the cases haven't gone to court yet). But there's no law or anything barring any particular DNA testing from being OK in court, as long as it was constitutionally collected; all it takes is one "expert" who is willing to convince a judge, and experts have convinced judges of things with way less backing than than "a match on twelve skin cells is a scientifically valid match". If you think it'll take more than ten years for someone to convince a judge that they can show something like that to a jury, you have a way rosier opinion of our court system than I do.

[(Anonymous)]

DA

Have any links to the case or the podcast in question?

[(Anonymous)]

I don't know if any podcasts have covered it (I don't really do true crime podcasts much, other than Affirmative Murder) but here's an article from the company that did the matching https://dnasolves.com/articles/stephanie-isaacson.html

(It was fifteen not twelve, dunno why I couldn't keep that straight.)

In this case it was almost definitely the right guy - it was a sex assault semen sample and he has a history of violent sex crimes - but it's proof of concept that people are doing it with samples that small, and if it keeps getting hype like this some *will* do it with random dust on someone's sweater eventually.