[ SECRET POST #5961 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #5961 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.

























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 18 secrets from Secret Submission Post #852.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: +1

[(Anonymous)]

Commenting to agree about the aesthetic not being plagiarized. Film costumers are constantly making off with shiny stylish things from various subcultures - I met Goths wearing "finger armor" that would have been more accurately described as talon/glove hybrids, first homebrew and then small-shop and eventually available in mall stores, long before that ended up on screen.

And I tend to be more annoyed when costume design doesn't make the most of being able to show things that are a long ways from boring business-wear than I am with niche things. Although it's kind of annoying when people associating a particular look with a particular movie assume the people paid to make it had the time or the creativity to invent wholly novel ways to dress and adorn human bodies, and therefore somehow own the thing. Because usually? That's not the case at all.