Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2023-05-08 05:59 pm
[ SECRET POST #5967 ]
⌈ Secret Post #5967 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 28 secrets from Secret Submission Post #853.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-05-09 12:08 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-05-09 12:12 am (UTC)(link)Stop gatekeeping. People can headcanon what they want. They don't need a reason. It has no moral value attached.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-05-09 12:20 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-05-09 12:24 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-05-09 12:30 am (UTC)(link)That's funny, I had interpreted that the characters were still gay, just that the headcanon had their gender different.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-05-09 12:41 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-05-09 12:53 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-05-09 01:00 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-05-09 01:04 am (UTC)(link)Still think it's weird to default to gender changes being homophobic and making characters het though
no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-05-09 06:51 am (UTC)(link)Well, that's assuming they're in a relationship with each other, which is, to be fair, the usual case when two characters are described as gay at the same time.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-05-09 12:42 am (UTC)(link)You're talking about two fans. Without knowing anything else, I'd guess that fan B had just as much of a right as Fan A did to interpret things according to what made them happier.
And also, I don't think anyone should be forming strong judgments over a conversation that the OP only heard half of, in the first place.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-05-10 06:52 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-05-09 12:50 am (UTC)(link)Am I being charitable in thinking you know that means to GTFO? I.E. Leave the space, i.e. gatekeep? If so, please excuse my assumption that you're a jerk and downgrade you to idiot.
There is no moral implication in what any one person likes. The moral and societal harm comes from the MEDIA - the stuff controlled by rich people and spread far and wide. Not what Cindy from accounting likes to do with her blorbos.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-05-09 05:11 am (UTC)(link)That's what it means
no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-05-09 10:17 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-05-09 01:00 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-05-09 01:55 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-05-09 04:53 pm (UTC)(link)I'm with everyone who's saying it's aggressive, but where I've heard it used it still shades closer to grouchy than wishing death on the other person. "Long walk, short pier" is the angrier cousin of "go jump in a lake." It doesn't automatically have the implication "I hope you drown." Though it does mean "your behavior has offended me, and I want something bad to happen to you."
no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-05-09 05:22 pm (UTC)(link)I thought that it might have changed in definition with time, and found mixed results for that. Urban Dictionary says it means “go die”, but also says it means to just “shut up”. So it indeed seems like some people changed it so that falling in the water doesn’t necessarily mean drowning, like you said.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-05-09 07:44 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-05-09 12:49 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-05-09 09:29 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-05-09 04:54 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-05-09 12:15 am (UTC)(link)