[ SECRET POST #5989 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #5989 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Friday Night Funkin]



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.
























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 18 secrets from Secret Submission Post #856.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I mean the problem to me is that it's not just a historical inaccuracy - I don't think historical accuracy matters all that much and I am fine with racebent casting in general even for a lot of historical figures.

It's the fact that it's a specific pseudohistorical narrative that bothers me. My issue is that I don't want to promote those kinds of revisionist ideological misreadings of history. If some racists who complain about anything where a character is black complain about this too, there's nothing I can do about that.

[(Anonymous)]

You definitely sound like you care a normal amount about this.

[(Anonymous)]

NAYRT

Oh no, someone cares about what's true.

[(Anonymous)]

Do you care this much about other, more widely known and accepted as "true", revisionist accounts of history?

Maybe you do, but the "I care about historical accuracy" reasoning from most people sounds a lot like "Gamergate was about ethics in journalism" the way they frame it.

[(Anonymous)]

Do you care this much about other, more widely known and accepted as "true", revisionist accounts of history?

Yes, I would say generally I do.

Maybe you do, but the "I care about historical accuracy" reasoning from most people sounds a lot like "Gamergate was about ethics in journalism" the way they frame it.

I mean you have to use your own judgment on that. But just to reiterate - my point is not that I care about historical accuracy in general; I don't. I'm fine with racebent and genderbent casting in most contexts. My point is that I generally don't like pseudohistorical revisionism, no matter who's doing it.

[(Anonymous)]

Tell me more about your opinions about the integrity of women’s sports.

[(Anonymous)]

Lol nice try derailing in lieu of actual arguments.

[(Anonymous)]

da
I hate all revisionist and inaccurate history Media. They even incorrectly annotate some photos in history books to better match political agenda.