case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2023-05-31 06:10 pm

[ SECRET POST #5990 ]


⌈ Secret Post #5990 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.
























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 12 secrets from Secret Submission Post #856.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: TW: SA

(Anonymous) 2023-06-01 01:12 am (UTC)(link)
To be precise, the DA's office decided not to charge him with a crime.

Re: TW: SA

(Anonymous) 2023-06-01 01:17 am (UTC)(link)
DA Yeah the statement reads like they think he’s guilty but won’t be able to prove beyond reasonable doubt.

And of course most anyone with a brain who doesn’t hate women knows he’s guilty. AYRT is not someone you want with you on a night out 0.0

Re: TW: SA

(Anonymous) 2023-06-01 11:58 pm (UTC)(link)
That's not how the statement reads. Ask any lawyer.

Re: TW: SA

(Anonymous) 2023-06-02 02:15 pm (UTC)(link)
DA

That is how the statement reads if you know anything about the law. There’s no need to “Ask any lawyer.”, because actual lawyers have already spoken on this topic, and they all disagree with you. Don’t bring lawyers into a topic if you don’t actually understand what you’re talking about, and just assume everything works the way you want it to work. Lawyers examine the law, they don’t exist to prop up the nonsense of frothing stans who refuse to believe their guy can be a terrible person. Every lawyer that’s talked about this case agrees with ayrt that Hammer is likely guilty, but it’s difficult to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt because he’s covered his tracks so well, as many people with his power and wealth are able to do. It’s really embarrassing that you showed your ignorance like this.

Re: TW: SA

(Anonymous) 2023-06-04 10:06 pm (UTC)(link)
Which lawyers have talked about this case? I haven't heard a word from anyone.
And I am not ignorant or a frothing stan, so stop calling people ignorant because they don't agree with you.

Re: TW: SA

(Anonymous) 2023-06-04 10:07 pm (UTC)(link)
Ask Gloria Allred why she dropped Efrosina. Ask Efrosina why she refuses to sign a declaration under perjury. Stop bothering people on line and deeming them frothing ignorant stans because you're a general asshole that hates men and women that do not share your belief that he's guilty.

Re: TW: SA

(Anonymous) 2023-06-01 11:59 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm the AYRT. Are you fucking insinuating I'm a dummy, a rapist, or both? Go fuck yourself and die, you piece of crap.

Re: TW: SA

(Anonymous) 2023-06-02 02:08 pm (UTC)(link)
You’re proving that his stans are just as unhinged as he is. You’re literally wishing death on someone for having an opinion you don’t like. You’re the only piece of shit here.

They are calling you a dummy, which is not something where wishing death is an appropriate response. But I’d say you’re more delusional and willfully ignorant than dumb. You refuse to see the evidence right in front of your face just because Hammer is your fave. And they were not calling you a rapist, you’re pulling that from absolutely nowhere. They were saying that you would be a bad person to have around on a night out, because of how dismissive you are to rapists. They’re not saying you’re a rapist, but they are saying you’d turn a blind eye and not help. Which is a reasonable assumption to make, considering you’re displaying exactly that behavior. Get help and learn that faves are fallible, and bad behavior needs accountability, not stans pretending nothing happened and harassing victims.

Re: TW: SA

(Anonymous) 2023-06-02 04:50 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't believe he is a mass rapist. Case closed.

Re: TW: SA

(Anonymous) 2023-06-02 04:51 pm (UTC)(link)
You're a fucking idiot to assume I wouldn't help anyone. I just don't believe HE is a rapist. Go fuck yourself and die as well.

Re: TW: SA

(Anonymous) 2023-06-02 04:52 pm (UTC)(link)
Stop assuming I'm a stan that harasses victims. You don't know me at all, shit-for-brains.

Re: TW: SA

(Anonymous) 2023-06-02 08:22 pm (UTC)(link)
If you really gave a damn, you would ask Efrosina WHY she didn't sign a declaration under perjury of all her accusations. You would ask Gloria Allred- a respected feminist lawyer- WHY she dropped Efrosina. You would ask Efrosina WHY she isn't filing a lawsuit.
But instead, you are "shooting the messenger" on the internet: people that don't believe the claims of this specific woman and then saying that means all her disbelievers hate women, are Armie's goo-goo eyed stans, are rape apologists, disbelieve ALL women and would never give a shit about a female possibly being raped or kidnapped on a night out on the town EVER, and are harassing and stalking anyone online that just doesn't believe HER.
Go take a long walk off a short pier.