[ SECRET POST #6006 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6006 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.
[From]



__________________________________________________



06.
[Youtube channel "Hello Future Me"]



__________________________________________________



07.
[Monark]



__________________________________________________



08.



__________________________________________________


















09. [SPOILERS for Across the Spiderverse]




__________________________________________________



10. [WARNING for transphobia/standard JKR stuff]






















































Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #858.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

No doctor worth their degree would ever give children drugs in these circumstances. Meaning that these abusive parents would DO THIS ANYWAY. They would have to go out of their way to find a doctor who would agree to do that. So sure, instead of enforcing already strict licensing and ethical rules for doctors, let's try to stop them by killing trans kids along the way, 'cause trans lives don't matter.

And also, stop conflating transmen with sexual abuse survivors. The idea that transmen are just abused and confused wittle girls who don't know what they're doing is deeply misogynist.

[(Anonymous)]

Nah. What's "deeply misogynist" is closing your ears to all the people who have expressly said that not wanting to be sexually abused was a major motivation for trying to not be read by other people as female. That there are trans men who have other motivations, sure. But the fact that this particular group makes your cause look bad, or you think it does, is not grounds for announcing that they don't exist or they don't matter.

As for "no doctor worth their degree" I want to agree with you, and on purely ethical grounds, I do. But if you dig into the history of puberty blockers, you will find that their use was, ah, "pioneered" shall we say, with the bodies of disabled people. Just like a lot of other experimental treatments. So casting it as a situation with rogue doctors who don't deserve their licenses is disingenuous.

I am not saying that making it harder for trans people to get puberty blockers is a reasonable course of action: I don't think it is. I am saying that what you are presenting as "uncontroversial" and "well accepted" use of puberty blockers on cis kids has been hotly contested and argued over. For reasons that rarely come up, but matter.

[(Anonymous)]

That there are trans men who have other motivations, sure.

You mean the MAJORITY of transmen?

But the fact that this particular group makes your cause look bad, or you think it does, is not grounds for announcing that they don't exist or they don't matter.

I didn't do that. YOU are the one doing that with transmen. Because some women have to find shelter in the concept of transmen to protect themselves because no one else will is not any kind of argument against gender affirming medical treatment. It's just an argument against misogynistic society and culture. They come from the same source. This is why it doesn't make my cause look bad. Women do what they have to to survive. The fact that the act of surviving comes with side effects is not a reason to take away the mode of survival. It's a reason to fix the CAUSE. Which is a culture that hates women AND transmen.


But if you dig into the history of puberty blockers, you will find that their use was, ah, "pioneered" shall we say, with the bodies of disabled people

If you dig into the medical history of ANYTHING you will find that it was "pioneered" on the bodies of people who couldn't say no. Modern gynecology was "pioneered" on enslaved black women with no anesthesia. This ain't special, my dude. MODERN doctors doing this are in fact rogue who don't deserve their license.

I am saying that what you are presenting as "uncontroversial" and "well accepted" use of puberty blockers on cis kids has been hotly contested and argued over.

Except not? At least not in the medical community, which has used puberty blockers on cis kids since the 1980s. They are well documented, well studied, and very safe when used under supervision. I don't think uneducated people not accepting them makes them controversial. I don't take advice on medicine from plumbers. I don't take plumbing advice from accountants.

[(Anonymous)]

Gender care in the US is doing an inadequate job telling the difference between kids who will be glad they transitioned and kids who were trying to escape something that drugs and surgeries will not help them escape. The fact that the right tries to exploit this doesn't make it any less of a problem.

By the way, I think it either says something about how ingrained your gender stereotypes are that you think I'm male, or you're working curiously hard to try to find out whether I am by throwing gendered descriptors at me and seeing if I react.

Modern doctors doing what doctors never stopped doing "don't deserve their license." Okay. But these are the same people that ought to be trusted when they assert that puberty blockers are great.