[ SECRET POST #6017 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6017 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.
























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 23 secrets from Secret Submission Post #860.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[fscom]

01. https://i.imgur.com/TzbGRMT.png

[(Anonymous)]

I don't hate that idea.

[tabaqui]

I'm in. :D

[(Anonymous)]

I don't usually find Star Trek medical stories very compelling because they rarely make it clear what the stakes are and why they can cure disease X but not disease Y and the technobabble overwhelms the story. But remote area medicine would solve a lot of those problems! Like, "we can cure this guy in five minutes if we get him back to a station/ship with a full medbay, but here we have to use these small shuttles, so we're going to have to improvise a way to keep him alive!" and "oh no the engine's gone out!" and all the other fun stuff that the Flying Doctors dealt with on the show and also deal with in real life.

[(Anonymous)]

TBF this is also a problem that Trek has in non-medical shows a lot of the time. And the solution is the same in both cases: better writing.

[(Anonymous)]

Even TOS (Those Old Scientists) knew the strength of the show was in their character writing.

[malurette]

I would love this!

[(Anonymous)]

I like it! Have you ever read the Sector General stories? They had this type of flavor.