ext_278733 (
grayout.livejournal.com) wrote in
fandomsecrets2007-04-02 06:56 pm
[ SECRET POST #087 ]
⌈ Secret Post #087 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe.
1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 46 secrets from Secret Submission Post #013.
Secrets Not Posted: 0 broken links, 0 not!secrets, 0 not!fandom.
Next Secret Post: Tomorrow, Tuesday, April 3rd, 2007.
Current Secret Submission Post: Here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

5
HAPPY GO LUCKYYYY
WE ARE THE WAD OF DOUGH
WEEEEE DIDN'T EAT
Q Q Q Q S S S S... ... I
Hahaha. That is so much win. ♥
Re: 5
no subject
AND IF I DON'T, WE SHOULD BE FRIENDS.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2007-04-02 23:14 (UTC) - Expandno subject
Also 3! ♥
7
(Anonymous) - 2007-04-02 23:10 (UTC) - ExpandRe: 7
Re: 7
(Anonymous) - 2007-04-02 23:21 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2007-04-02 23:14 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2007-04-02 23:30 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2007-04-02 23:15 (UTC) - Expandno subject
6. You'd be surprised. There have been secrets I've made that I swore up and down people would recognize as me... and then didn't. XD Although I tend to use pictures from fandoms I know, and those are small fandoms.. so.. xD people are like "lol a ___ picture, it must be misu."
Is it me, or does it seem like a lot of the secrets these days are messages to other people? And the people the secrets are directed to will know exactly who sent them, usually!
It's like a super-passive-aggreseive way to attack someone. I dunno. I like it when secrets are vague when it has to do with who they're targeted at, and who they're from.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2007-04-03 02:09 (UTC) - Expandno subject
re: 7
no subject
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2007-04-04 14:58 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2007-04-04 06:09 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
HOWEVER. I WOULD LIKE TO ADD THAT THE ONE EXCEPTION TO THIS WAS MORROWIND. I HAD THE ORIGINAL VERSION. I HAD GAME OF THE YEAR VERSION. THAT GAME OWNED MY SOUL
I'm still half-tempted to get a 360 JUST to play Oblivion. ._.
9. Emi.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
I played Jade Empire for a while and it was pretty fun, but it's not worth getting a whole system just for one or two games.
4 & 7. I thiiink I know who you two are. Well, I know 4 for sure, because I just so happened to see that entry a few days ago.
I agree with 7 by the way. Not much of a secret though ]: Doesn't everyone?
7
(Anonymous) - 2007-04-03 23:33 (UTC) - ExpandRe: 7
no subject
2. Ah, irresponsible, leeching lame cosplayers who think they're great at a character.
3. I'm partial to more the minor characters than the main ones, as well.
4. Y HALO THAR CASE.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2007-04-03 03:46 (UTC) - Expandno subject
3. She is so funny.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2007-04-03 03:48 (UTC) - Expandno subject
but I'm guilty of the same thing lol
7
(Anonymous) - 2007-04-03 23:35 (UTC) - Expand1
no subject
I may bitch at work about how people that play nothing but shitty FPSs and Nascar games all day need to broaden their horizons, but really, so do RPG folk. A quick play of Gears of War or Hitman: Blood Money (or Kane and Lynch, when it comes out) or Geometry Wars would do a lot of people some good.
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject