[ SECRET POST #6047 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6047 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.
[Yokosuka SAVER TIGER / X JAPAN]



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.

























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 07 secrets from Secret Submission Post #864.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[fscom]

Transcript: I'm actually very interested in what will happen when it comes to using AI as a tool for art/writing/etc. Note that I say as a TOOL, not as something that will replace artists. I tend to think of AI as a sort of combination of a sampler and a drum machine - it both is designed for preexisting material and can be programmed to create a variety of things from a certain databank. I'm fairly certain that, once the laws surrounding AI catch up with the technology, the rules will be somewhat similar to sampling laws - the end result will have to a) be opt-in both for the AI's databank and whatever material is published, b) credit whatever material is being "sampled" by the AI, and c) have a system to compensate the sample sources.

Of course, my interest in what artists will do with a new tool in their toolbox runs DIRECTLY against my issues with the way that sampling and plagerism laws have been interpreted, especially in recent years :/